Legal Opinion

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 10, 1990No. 89 C 1971PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LINDBERG, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company (Great Lakes), motion to bar Mr. John Rumbarger and Franklin Research Center from acting as a consultant or testifying experts for the third-party defendant, FAG Bearings Corporation (FAG). Plaintiff contends that a conflict of interest exists if Mr. Rumbarger is allowed to be retained by FAG, because Mr. Rumbarger works for the same company as plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Leonard, and Mr. Rumbarger often supervises Dr. Leonard’s work. The facts are not as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  2. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Norton Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  3. Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. DIV. BLDG. & CONSTR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  4. Miles v. FarrellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  2. Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  3. Nelson v. McCrearyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. United States Ex Rel. Cherry Hill Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Healthcare Rehab Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  5. Cordy v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API