Miles v. Farrell
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETZENDANNER, District Judge.
The issue before the court is whether the court properly may bar the testimony of Dr. John T. Flynn who treated the plaintiff, a blind child, both before and after he was retained as an expert by one of the defendants, without disclosing his relationship with the defendant. 1 On the facts of this case, I conclude that the doctor may not be called by any defendant to testify at the trial either as an expert or as a treating physician.
The facts are as follows: On August 17, 1978, the plaintiff’s parents were deposed. Two attorneys…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co. v. Norton Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.