Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Cherry Hill Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Healthcare Rehab Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 10, 1997No. CIV. 94-664(JBS)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KUGLER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the motion by Healthcare Rehab Systems, Inc. (“HRS”), Doug Kosmin and James Luchansky (collectively, the “Defendants”) to dis qualify counsel for qui tam plaintiff Relator Cherry Hill Convalescent Center, Inc. (“CHCC”) and its expert consultant, the accounting firm of Heffler, Radetich & Saitta (“Heffler”). Defendants contend that the Heffler firm and plaintiffs counsel should be disqualified because Heffler has unique access to confidential information relevant to this litigation as a result of its prior…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Simbraw, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. EMC Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Mitchell v. WilmoreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Greene, Tweed of Delaware, Inc. v. DuPont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re Pelvic mesh/gynecare Lit.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.