Legal Opinion
Clark v. Stotts
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1954No. Civ. 8421PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment quieting title in plaintiff, and awarding damages for timber removed by defendants from the property.
Both parties claim to deraign title through one Pillsbury. Plaintiff’s deed dated July 14, 1883, described the property as follows:
“All that certain piece or parcel of land lying and being inside of W. V. Clarks enclosure, and located North of the Wagon road leading from Mokelumne Hill to David McCarty’s Sawmill, and bounded as follows: N by land of W. V. Clark, S. by Mokelumne Hill Wagon road, E. by line of Clarks Canal, W. by Henhouse yard…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sheehan v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Yuba River Sand Co. v. City of MarysvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Borden v. BoyvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Sun Lumber Co. v. BradfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Marriage v. KeenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Nutting v. Herman Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kraus v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Schoenfeld v. PritzkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.