Legal Opinion
Marriage v. Keener
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 1994No. C016248PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NICHOLSON, J.
— Valerie Marriage appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her action to quiet title. She challenges the dismissal of her adverse possession cause of action, which the court found barred by the doctrine of loches, and the dismissal of a defendant as a sanction for failure to effect timely service. We reverse.
Factual and Procedural Background
On July 3, 1991, Valerie 1 filed this action to quiet title to four contiguous parcels of real property in Carmichael, asserting she had acquired title to these parcels by adverse possession. 2 The four parcels are referred to in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Cannon v. StockmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bank of America NT&SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Wantuch v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Nielsen v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mehdizadeh v. MincerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.