Legal Opinion

Sun Lumber Co. v. Bradfield

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1932No. Docket No. 8241PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

In. this action to quiet title the trial court entered its decree quieting the title of plaintiff and appellant against defendants with the exception of respondents herein and as to said respondents it decreed that they had a valid materialman’s lien upon the premises which was prior to the claim of said appellant. This appeal is taken upon the judgment-roll.

The property involved in this action is known as lot 237 of tract 5980 as per map thereof recorded in the records of Los Angeles County. Appellant claims as the purchaser on a foreclosure sale under the hereinafter mentioned deed of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Dam v. ZinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Weidenmueller v. Stearns Ranchos Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Rucker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bothin v. the California Title Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ben Greenblatt v. Ernest R. Utley, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Moses A. Fleming, a BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. Clark v. StottsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Milano v. BulleriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Barrow v. Santa Monica Builders Supply Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Sun Lumber Company v. BradfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API