Legal Opinion

Kraus v. Griswold

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1965No. Civ. 21921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment quieting title and fixing a boundary line in favor of defendants.

Questions Presented

1. Was there an agreement to establish a boundary line?

2. Did the Waite survey establish a boundary line?

3. Was a boundary established by practical location?

4. Adverse possession.

5. Denial of motion for new trial.

Record

Plaintiffs own Lot 17 and defendants own Lot 16 on Corinthian Island in Belvedere. The first cause of action in plaintiffs’ complaint is based upon alleged agreed boundary line by the predecessors of the parties. The second cause of action alleges…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Clapp v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Mello v. WeaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Martin v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Armitage v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Marsh v. EdelsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Minson Co. v. Aviation FinanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Roman v. RiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Zachery v. McWilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API