Legal Opinion

Yuba River Sand Co. v. City of Marysville

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1947No. Civ. 7275PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In this suit to quiet title to real property the plaintiff has appealed from that portion of the decree which awards to the defendant and cross-complainant, Joe Foo, as administrator, the possession of the east one-quarter of Lot One of the property involved. Said defendant has also appealed from that other portion of the decree which quiets title in plaintiff, by adverse possession, to the west one-half of the east one-half of said Lot One. The balance of the property, to which title was quieted in plaintiff, is not involved on this appeal. It is conceded that the city of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Tewksbury v. MagraffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Franklin v. MeridaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Davis v. McGrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Brown v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Nutting v. Herman Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Madden v. Alpha Hardware & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Ortiz v. Pacific States Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Kasey v. Molybdenum Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API