Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C.R. England, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff-Appellant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) initiated this suit against Defendant-Appellee C.R. England, Inc. (“C.R. England”) under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-213. The alleged ADA violations arise from the employment relationship between C.R. England and Walter Watson, a former driver and trainer for the company. Mr. Watson subsequently intervened in the suit, alleging similar claims under the ADA and additional claims under Utah state law. The district court granted summary judgment in…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by285 opinions
- Lamont Wilson v. Dollar General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- James v. WadasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Dewitt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Tesone v. Empire Marketing StrategiesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Smothers v. Solvay Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
280 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.