Legal Opinion
Conroy v. Vilsack
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 11, 2013No. 11-4091PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Laura Conroy filed this Title VII lawsuit against her employer, the United States Forest Service, after it (among other things) filled an open position with a male employee, instead of her. The district court excluded the testimony of Ms. Con-roy’s two experts and granted summary judgment to the Forest Service. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I
The Forest Service, an agency within the Department of Agriculture, manages the national forests. It is divided into nine geographical regions, and since 1991, Ms. Conroy has been employed with Region 4…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Khalik v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Bird v. West Valley CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Noe MancillasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Ford v. Jackson National LifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Riser v. QEP EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.