Legal Opinion

Nickey v. Zonker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1899No. 2,780PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, C. J.

— The appellee sued the appellants, Addison B. Nickey, Samuel M. Nickey, William'Nickey, and Daniel Blucher, in the DeKalb Circuit Court, for the conversion of certain timber in logs. On a trial by jury in that court a special verdict was returned, consisting of interrogatories- and answers thereto, as provided for in the statute of 1895 relating to special verdicts. The court overruled a motion of the appellants for judgment on the verdict, and, upon motion of the appellee, the court granted a venire de novo.

Upon a careful examination of the interrogatories and answers, we find the special…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Armacost v. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BalchIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Tucker v. HyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Lester v. EastIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Cromwell v. WilkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Efroymson v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Peoples State Bank v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Evansville & Princeton Traction Co. v. BroermannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Nickey v. ZonkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Evansville & Princeton Traction Co. v. BroermannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API