Legal Opinion · Dissent

Evansville & Princeton Traction Co. v. Broermann

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1907No. 5,893Published

Prom Superior Court of Vanderburgh County; John U. Foster, Judge. Action by H. Rudolph Broermann against the Evansville & Princeton Traction Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant, appeals.

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Roby, P. J.

The defendant had a right to have his ease tried by a jury. Such right extended to every issue involved therein. It was submitted to a jury, and a verdict returned which, as to one of said issues, is held by the judge to have been unsupported by evidence. A jury which finds one fact against the defendant without evidence may also find other facts against him in the same way, and, when he is able to establish to the satisfaction of the judge that it has so found, he is entitled by the express provision of the statute to a new trial. In this case the defendant made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. WilkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Carmichael v. ShielIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Nickey v. ZonkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API