Legal Opinion

Nickey v. Zonker

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1903No. 4,291PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Steuben Circuit Court; J. A. Woodhull, Special Judge. Action by Anthony Zonker against Addison B. Nickey and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

The first trial of this cause was in the DeKalb Circuit Court, where the action was originally commenced. A venire de novo was granted, and the cause venued'to Steuben county, where the second trial occurred. Upon appeal to this court, the judgment of the circuit court of Steuben county was reversed. Nickey v. Zonker, 22 Ind. App. 211. This appeal is from a judgment rendered against appellants upon the third trial of the cause.

Briefly stated, the facts out of which the controversy arose were as follows: Anthony Zonker, in the year 1895, was the owner of real estate in DeKalb county, on which *89t…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nickey v. ZonkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Crowe v. KellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. LeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. ETC. v. WeissIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Supreme Lodge of Modern American Fraternal Order v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. ETC. v. WeissIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API