Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Balch

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1886No. 11,881PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Zollars, J. —

Appellee brought this action to recover the value of a large amount of bridge timber, piling timber and railroad cross-ties, which he alleges appellant took and converted to its own use.

It is averred in the complaint that appellee was the owner of such timber and ties, located along the line of appellant’s road in the counties of Carroll, Clinton, Boone, Hamilton and Marion, and that he was unable to give a more particular description of the exact location, because of the loss of a memorandum. A motion to make the complaint more certain as to the location of the property was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Laverty v. . SnethenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Robinson v. SkipworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Teegarden v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railway Co. v. BurgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API