Legal Opinion
Moore v. Craig
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 1935No. Civ. 9000PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDS, J., pro tem.
The defendants appeal from a judgment entered against them on a promissory note, challenging the findings of the court as being insufficient to support the judgment.
The complaint alleges the execution and delivery by the defendants of a promissory note dated in January, 1929, due one year thereafter, and payable to one Hull; its endorsement .and delivery by Hull to one Topham, in July, 1929; its endorsement and delivery by Topham to Weaver Lumber Company in October, 1930, and the appointment of plaintiff as the latter’s trustee in bankruptcy after adjudication. The answer…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bedell v. HerringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Pastene v. PardiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Frascona v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Sweet v. HamilothorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. K & L Litho Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Bertone v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Morrow v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Reinert v. ProudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.