Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Romero
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
Defendant Romero appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff insurance companies. The basis of the action was a subrogation claim assigned to plaintiffs by their insured, one Pollack, to whom plaintiffs had paid the amount of a fire loss. Liability of Romero existed only in case the fire was caused by his negligence. The court found that Romero caused the fire but made no finding that it was caused by his negligence nor was there any finding of facts from which it would follow by necessary implication that Romero was negligent.
Romero sold a large dwelling house to Pollack, but remained in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Scott v. SheedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Duehren v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Moore v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hill v. RalphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hodges v. SevernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- McKinley v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Kyle v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- In Re PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.