Legal Opinion

Bedell v. Herring

California Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1888No. 12719PublishedCited by 57 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note for five hundred dollars, made by defendant, payable to the order of E. Jones, due in six months, and by the latter indorsed and delivered to plaintiff before maturity. Judgment went for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. The appeal is from the judgment, and upon the judgment roll alone. The defense relied on was, that said payee Jones procured defendant to sign the note by falsely and fraudulently representing that it was not a note, but a mere memorandum about a certain agency.

It appears from the findings that at the time defendant signed the note the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meyer v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Fuller v. HutchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Shepherd v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mitchell v. Hackett & DickensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. United States v. KimballU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API