Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. K & L Litho Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. (Rochester), appellant, which as plaintiff sought damages allegedly arising from the breach of three lease agreements, hereinafter defined, entered into by the various defendants (respondents).
In August 1962, Harry Kater and Milton Lieberman, both defendants in this action, organized defendant K & L Litho Corporation (Litho) to engage in the business of printing. Messrs. Kater and Lieberman acquired presses and other equipment, financing a large part of the purchase price with the proceeds of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Wells v. ComstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Ury v. Jewelers Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Kee v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re J. David Dominelli, Debtors. M. Larry Lawrence v. Steinford Holding B v. a Netherlands CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Boerner v. Colwell Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Epstein v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.