Legal Opinion

Lencioni v. Dan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1954No. Civ. 16064PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiffs, entitling their complaint one for “specific performance,” brought an action to compel performance by defendants of their written agreement to pay the purchase price of certain real and personal property. The prayer of the complaint is that defendants be compelled to specifically perform in accordance with their written agreement, which is set forth as an exhibit to the complaint, that plaintiffs have judgment for $32,500, * which was the portion of the $42,000 purchase price defendants had agreed to pay in cash, and that, if specific performance cannot be granted, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Sutliff v. Sweetwater Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Amaranth Land Co. v. CoreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Hougham v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Guaranty Corp. v. StoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Engelman v. BookastaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Fraser v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. McGreevy v. Constitution Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Minor v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API