Legal Opinion

Rayburn v. Day

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1928PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The assignments of error are based upon the admission and exclusion of evidence, and instructions to the jury. In order to facilitate the disposition of these assignments of error it will be helpful if we bear in mind the following undisputed facts: the plaintiff, a woman forty-three years of age, consulted one Dr. R. H. Fields, a physician engaged in his practice in the City of Eugene. About July 11th, Dr. Fields called in consultation the defendant : the two physicians concluded that the plaintiff had an infection of the pelvic region of the body; they advised her that a surgical operation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Akridge v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Langford v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lehman v. KnottOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hills v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Beadle v. PaineOregon Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Rogers v. Meridian Park HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McGulpin v. BessmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1961

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API