Legal Opinion

Hills v. Shaw

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1913PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From Josephine: Frank M. Calkins, Judge. This is an action by Thomas Curtis Hills against Dr. H. M. Shaw for malpractice. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $6,000, the defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions to enter a judgment of nonsuit. Department 1.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

It appears in the record that the plaintiff’s leg was broken on June 4, 1910; that the defendant was called to treat the same and undertook to reduce the fracture. It is admitted that at all the times mentioned in the pleadings he was a physician and surgeon practicing his profession in Ashland, Oregon. The complaint specifies the negligence imputed to the defendant in these words: ‘ ‘ That the negligence, unskillfulness, and *462carelessness of the defendant of which the plaintiff complains herein consisted of the defendant’s not bringing and keeping said broken parts of said bone into…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ewing v. GoodeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1897
  2. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Chicago City Railway Co. v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Langford v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Meridian Park HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Papke v. HarbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lehman v. KnottOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Rayburn v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API