Legal Opinion

Eckleberry v. Kaiser Foundation Northern Hospitals

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1961PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for a personal injury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Kaiser Foundation Northern Hospitals, with a separate verdict in favor of the defendant Dr. Robert W. Reubendale. Judgments were entered on the verdicts. The defendant hospital then moved for a judgment non obstante veredicto, which was granted. The plaintiff has appealed, alleging prejudicial error in the trial of the case which resulted in a judgment for the defendant Reubendale, and error in the trial court’s granting of the judgment…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Schell v. . PlumbNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Donaldson v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Tuite v. UNION PACIFIC STAGESOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Mills v. CatlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Heno v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Miller v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Wilson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Rogers v. Meridian Park HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API