Legal Opinion

McGulpin v. Bessmer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 13, 1950No. 47594PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, J.

The first count of plaintiff’s amended petition charges defendants, Drs. Bessmer and Middleton, and their employee, Dr. Spang, with want of due care, skill and knowledge in treating varicose veins in plaintiff’s leg, resulting in gangrene and amputation of the leg. The second count alleges defendants and Dr. Spang, following an operation on plaintiff’s leg, abandoned and without cause failed to treat him, so amputation of the leg was necessary.

A separate count in a supplemental petition alleges Dr, Spang, without due care and skill and by a gross technical error, mistakenly ligated and cut…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Shilkret v. Annapolis Emergency Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API