Beadle v. Paine
Oregon Supreme Court
From Lane: James W. Hamilton, Judge. Action in tort by Herbert Beadle against Paine & Kuykendall, surgeons, resulting in a judgment for defendants, from which this appeal is taken.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Wolverton
This is an action to recover for injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff in the negligent treatment of his arm by the defendants; the same having been broken,.- dislocated, and bruised. Numerous errors are assigned in the record, and such as are possessed of obvious merit will be examined.
1. The question propounded to Dr. T. W. Harris on cross-examination were not improper. He was asked on his examination in chief if there was not an X-ray machine in Eugene, to which he answered that Dr. Prentice had one. To push the. inquiry -on cross-examination to the extent qf ascertaining *426whe…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jones v. ConnOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Whitesell v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Gramm v. BoenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- City of Bloomington v. ShrockIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Pelky v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lawrence v. WirthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Rayburn v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Son v. Ashland Community Healthcare ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Chudson v. RatraCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- In Re Estate of McDadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.