Legal Opinion

Mansur v. Haughey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1878PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit by the appellee, against the appellant, for the abatement of an alleged nuisance, and for damages.

The nuisance charged to be maintained by the appellant is the obstruction of a public alley in the city of Indianapolis.

Answer in general denial.

Trial by the court; judgment, over a motion for a new trial, in favor of the appellee, and for the abatement of the alleged nuisance.

This judgment in special term was affirmed, on appeal, by the superior court in general term.

The assignment of errors, in this court, is as follows:

“ Appellant says, the Marion Superior Court, in general term, erred in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grube v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Pettis v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. McCormick v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  5. Wilder v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Neil v. Independent Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Tucker v. ConradIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Bidinger v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Kiefer v. KlinsickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API