Legal Opinion

Grube v. Wells

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 29, 1871PublishedCited by 74 opinions

Appeal from Des Moines District Oourt. Action to recover tbe possession of a part of lot 260, in the n°Ubern addition to the’ city of Burlington, being a strip of about the width of fifteen feet, of the south end of said lot, Trial to the court without a jury, and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Ch. J.

The district court found the following facts, and thereon rendered judgment for plaintiff : The plaintiff is the owner of lot 280, in the northern addition to the city of Burlington, and the defendant owns lot 1, in Wood’s subdivision, which adjoins plaintiff’s lot on the *149south. About twenty-five years ago defendant’s grantor inclosed lot 1, and made , other improvements upon it. The fence on the north was set about fifteen feet over the line upon lot 260, which was uninclosed, and remained in that condition until within the last four or five years. Defendant and her grantor have…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Jackson Ex Dem. Bradstreet v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Close v. SammSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  4. Brown v. CockerellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  5. Riley v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Miller v. Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Omaha & Grant Smelting & Refining Co. v. TaborSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Philbin v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Janke v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API