Tucker v. Conrad
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
In this case the appellee, Conrad, sued the appellants, Tucker, Greene and the city of "Warsaw, in a complaint of two paragraphs. The object of the suit was to recover damages for breaking and entering, as alleged, the appellee’s close, destroying his fences, etc. The close in question is described as lot No. 58, in the original plat of the town, now' city, of Warsaw, in Kosciusko county. The appellants’ defence was that such lot of close had, with the ac*350quiescence of the owners thereof from time to time, and by its long user by the public as a thoroughfare, become a public street or highway…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ross v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Faust v. City of HuntingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Hinkle v. ShelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Mansur v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Mansur v. HaugheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. RowanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Shellhouse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Walker v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Strange v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.