Legal Opinion

Pettis v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1877PublishedCited by 56 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Perkins, O. J.

Suit by appellees, against the appellant and others, for the abatement of a nuisance, to the injury of lot four, in square sixty-five, in the city of Indianapolis, of which they are owners.

In 1862, William and Hugh Glenn were the owners in fee-simple, and in the possession, of lot number three, in square sixty-five, in the city of Indianapolis, Indiana. It is bounded on the north by Washington street, on the east by lot number two in said square, on the south by Pearl street, and on the west by the same alley that bounds the plaintiffs’ said lot on the east. Said lots three and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hart v. Mayor of AlbanyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1832
  2. People v. CunninghamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. White v. FlannigainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  4. Bigelow v. Hartford Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  5. Common Council v. CroasIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API