Legal Opinion

Bidinger v. Bishop

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 8698PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Newcomb, C.

The appellants sued the appellees for trespass, in tearing down and removing portions of the fence -enclosing the grounds of the Mt. Carmel Presbyterian Church.

The amended answer of the defendants consisted of a general denial, and three special paragraphs. The plaintiffs •demurred to the second, third and fourth paragraphs, on the ground that they did not contain facts sufficient to con*246stitue a defence to the action. The demurrers were severally overruled, to which the plaintiffs excepted, and then filed a reply in denial. The cause was submitted to the court for trial, with a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Greer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. City of Columbus v. DahnIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Hays v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. State v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Summers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Board of Commissioners v. LeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. NoftsgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Evans v. BlankenshipArizona Supreme Court · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API