Legal Opinion

Giordano v. Czerwinski

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 1, 1966No. 37, 1965PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

This appeal involves the propriety of the Superior Court’s computation of the period of limitations under the circumstances of the case.

The matter is presented on the pleadings: By their complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that on January 30,1960 they purchased a second automobile and requested the defendant, through whom they had previously acquired automobile insurance, to add the new car to the existing policy. It is alleged that the defendant stated that he would ascertain the amount of the premium and that, in the meanwhile, the plaintiffs could assume that the new…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. First National BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1900
  2. Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
  3. Trainer v. DeemerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Tyson Foods, Inc. Consolidated Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
  2. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Halpern v. BarranCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  4. Nardo v. Guido DeAscanis & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1969
  5. Freedman v. Beneficial Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API