Nardo v. Guido DeAscanis & Sons, Inc.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSICK, Judge.
This is the decision on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The undisputed facts are these:
In 1956 the parties entered into a written contract for the construction of a combination business and residential property. Construction was completed in July, 1957. Sometime in 1959 plaintiffs first noticed that a basement wall became damp after rainfall. They did not suspect at that time that the cause might be a defect in the building’s superstructure. In fact they did not know the actual cause and had the wall waterproofed as a remedial measure. It was then that a sagging…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Mastellone v. Argo Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1951
- Giordano v. CzerwinskiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
3Cited by49 opinions
- Lock v. SchrepplerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
- Halpern v. BarranCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
- Ontario Hydro v. Zallea Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Kaufman v. C.L. McCabe & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Professional Collection Consultants v. LauronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.