Legal Opinion

Lieberman v. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 19, 1900No. Appeal prom Chancellor No. 3PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lore, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Nathan Lieberman, the appellant, one of the sureties on two official bonds of Peter T. E. Smith, late paying teller of the First National Bank of Wilmington, has appealed in this case from the decree of the Chancellor, made December 3, 1898, which dissolved a preliminary injunction granted by the late Chancellor Wolcott, November 6, 1893, restraining the bank from collecting the amount of certain defalcations of Smith, made by him while acting as teller of the said bank.

The bonds bore date, respectively, November 1, 1879, and July 6, 1885. Each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. First Massachusetts Turnpike Corp. v. FieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Graves v. Lebanon National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
  3. Charles v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  4. Sparks v. President of the Farmers' BankCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1869
  5. Best v. ConnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  3. Schmucking v. MayoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Halpern v. BarranCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  5. Waugh v. Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API