Legal Opinion

Trainer v. Deemer

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided May 22, 1933No. 152PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

This is an action of assumpsit, in which the declaration contains seven common counts, the one particularly relied upon being that for services rendered (work and labor done). The declaration, as amended, has affixed to it the following Bill of Particulars:

“Jan. 30, 1928
“Selden S. Deemer to T. Woodward Trainer, Jr.
“To furnishing the name of a purchaser for the foundry property near New Castle, Delaware, which name was American Chemical Co. of Ambler, Pa.,
“$2500.00.”

Among other pleas, the defendant has filed two, Nos. 3 and 4, alleging that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. First National BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1900
  2. Kolb v. BurkhardtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Reynolds v. HennessySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1890
  4. Ressler v. MarksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Williams v. BeltzSupreme Court of Delaware · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herbert J. Roberts v. Norman M. Ross, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956
  3. Lecates v. Justice Of The Peace Court No. 4 Of The State Of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Giordano v. CzerwinskiSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  5. Lecates v. Justice of Peace Court No. 4Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API