Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union v. Davis
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In 1984, the people of California amended our Constitution to state a fundamental public policy against the legalization in California of casino gambling of the sort then associated with Las Vegas and Atlantic City: “The Legislature has no power to authorize, and shall prohibit casinos of the type currently operating in Nevada and New Jersey.” (Cal. Const., art. IV, § 19, subd. (e), added by initiative, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 6, 1984).)
In 1998, at the November 3 General Election, the people approved a proposed initiative statute designated on the ballot as Proposition 5—“The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Panzer v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Indian Gaming Related Cases. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Elk Valley Rancheria Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Redding Rancheria Smith River Rancheria, and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. The State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Video Software Dealers Association v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Artichoke Joe's v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.