Legal Opinion
Calfarm Insurance v. Deukmejian
California Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1989No. S007838PublishedCited by 282 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROUSSARD, J.
In this case we consider various challenges to Proposition 103, an initiative measure enacted November 8, 1988, making numerous fundamental changes in the regulation of automobile and other types of insurance. Petitioners, seven insurers and the Association of California Insurance Companies, have filed an original petition for writ of mandate in this court, contending that Proposition 103 is unconstitutional on its face. They named as respondents Governor George Deukmejian, Attorney General John K. Van de Kamp, Insurance Commissioner Roxani Gillespie, and the State Board…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by282 opinions
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
277 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.