Legal Opinion
Artichoke Joe's v. Norton
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 5, 2002No. CIV.S-01-248-DFL-GGHPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM of OPINION AND ORDER
LEVI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs challenge the validity of compacts entered into under the Indian Gam ing Regulatory Act (“IGRA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701 et seq., between the State of California and certain Indian tribes. The compacts permit the tribes to offer Las Vegas style high stakes gaming, including slot machines. The compacts were specifically authorized by a California constitutional amendment, Proposition 1A, which gives the Governor the authority “to negotiate and conclude compacts ... for the operation of slot machines and for the conduct of…
2Cases cited103 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Wilbur v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Indian Gaming Related Cases. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Elk Valley Rancheria Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Redding Rancheria Smith River Rancheria, and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. The State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Levine v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.