Legal Opinion
Panzer v. Doyle
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 2004No. 03-0910-OAPublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 1. This is an original action under Article VII, Section 3(2) of the Wisconsin Constitution.1 The petitioners are Mary Panzer, personally and in her capacity as the Majority Leader of the Wisconsin Senate, John Gard, personally and in his capacity as Speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly, and the Joint Committee on Legislative Organization2 (collectively referred to as the petitioners). The respondents are James E. Doyle, in his official capacity as Governor of Wisconsin, and Marc J. Marotta, in his official *303capacity as Secretary of Administration (collectively referred to as the Governor).
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk NationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Wilbur v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. DoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- The Honorable William M. Gabler, Sr. v. Crime Victims Rights BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. StenklyftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.