Legal Opinion

Raven v. Deukmejian

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1990No. S016137PublishedCited by 241 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

I. Introduction

In this proceeding, we consider challenges to the validity of an initiative measure adopted at the June 5, 1990, Primary Election. This measure, designated on the ballot as Proposition 115, is entitled by its framers as the “Crime Victims Justice Reform Act.” Its stated general purpose is to adopt “comprehensive reforms . . . needed in order to restore balance and fairness to our criminal justice system.” To achieve that purpose, the measure adopts a variety of changes and additions to our state Constitution and statutes.

Petitioners herein are taxpayers and…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Barron Ex Rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  4. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Carlos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by241 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API