Legal Opinion

Pierce Oil Co. v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1925No. 1811PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

This is a proceeding under the statute for trial of the right of property to a bale of cotton claimed by Carroll, and which had been levied upon as the property of J. M. Blackerby under an execution against the latter in favor of the Pierce Oil Company. Upon trial without a jury judgment was rendered in favor of Carroll.

Appellant’s brief is not in compliance with the rules, and the appellee objects to its consideration on that account. We know ot no reason why the rules of briefing should not be complied with, but their disregard is of the most common occurrence. If we should refuse to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. L. H. Woods & Co. v. Half, Weiss & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Brewer v. BlantonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hopkins v. PartridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Rea v. P. E. Schow & Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Baker & Terrell v. GuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howley v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Barton v. LaryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Gans v. BrassellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API