Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Partridge

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1888No. 2504PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Camp. Tried below before the Hon. W. P. McLean. The opinion gives the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

This is a controversy as to the ownership of a cotton crop grown by one Quash Reed, under whom both parties claimed.

The burden of proof was upon appellee, and his right, whatever it is, was prior to that of appellant.

The testimony to the alleged sale by Reed to Partridge is as follows: Partridge testified: “Quash Reed was owing me for a tract of land and I held three notes of his—two for four bales and one for five bales of lint cotton—as a consideration for said land. All of these notes were past due. About four weeks before said levy (by appellant) I went over to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Brewer v. BlantonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. H. J. Allen & Bros. v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Needham v. CooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Big Four Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Stephens v. AdairTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. John E. Morrison & Co. v. MurffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API