Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Appellee objects to the consideration of appellant's brief for a number of reasons; one being that no assignments of error are copied therein. In its reply brief, appellant asks leave to amend its brief by adding thereto the fifth paragraph of its amended motion for new trial, which properly raises the question presented in its brief. The amendment is allowed, and the brief will be regarded as so amended.
The other objections, to consideration of the appeal upon its merits, are overruled. It is the established practice of this court to consider upon their merits all questions presented in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Western & Atlantic R. v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922
- Davis v. Akron Feed & M. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. HyderDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1922
- Central Warehouse Co. v. Chicago, R. I. &. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.