Legal Opinion

Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1927No. 2067Published

1Opinion of the CourtHIGGIbfS, J.

Appellee objects to tbe consideration of appellant’s brief for a number of reasons; one being that no assignments of error are copied therein. In its reply brief, appellant asks leave to amend its brief by adding thereto the fifth paragraph of its amended motion for new trial, which properly raises the question presented in its brief. The amendment is allowed, and the brief will be regarded as so amended.

The other objections, to consideration of the appeal upon its merits, are overruled. It is the established practice of this court to consider upon their merits all questions presented in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Western & Atlantic R. v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922
  3. Davis v. Akron Feed & M. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  4. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. HyderDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1922
  5. New York Central Railroad v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API