Legal Opinion

Angelex, Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 2, 2018No. 17-5269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tatel, Circuit Judge:

Nearly forty years ago, Congress authorized the Coast Guard to detain ships suspected of intentionally discharging oil and other contaminants into the sea. At the same time, Congress gave a ship "unreasonably detained or delayed" a cause of action to recover "any loss or damage suffered thereby." 33 U.S.C. § 1904 (h). Until today, no circuit has considered the contours of this cause of action. Sailing into uncharted waters, we ask whether the Coast Guard acted reasonably in detaining a vessel for nearly six months pending a criminal trial after its owner and operator…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & DunnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simon Bronner v. Lisa DugganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  2. Nederland Shipping Corp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  3. Blackwater Diving, LLC v. U. S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  4. Esters v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  5. Ham v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API