Legal Opinion
Ham v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 9, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2016-1720Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DOYLE RAY HAM, JR., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1720 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This is the second Title VII action brought by Plaintiff Doyle Ray Ham, Jr., proceeding pro se, challenging his non-selection for a position as a police officer with the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”). In 2013, Ham, an African-American man, sued the District of Columbia based on the MPD’s rejection of his 2007 job application on the ground that he had been arrested (although not convicted) for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.