Legal Opinion
Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 6, 1996No. 96-7014PublishedCited by 306 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Jerome D. Jackson appeals from the grant of summary judgment on the ground that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for leave to supplement his Rule 108(h) statement of material facts in dispute, and in granting appel-lee law firm’s motion to strike the deficient Rule 108(h) statement, in the absence of a finding of prejudice to the law firm or to the court. He also maintains that the district court erred in granting the law firm’s motion for summary judgment before searching the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by306 opinions
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Arrington, Derreck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
301 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.