Legal Opinion
Moore v. Hartman
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 7, 2009No. 08-5370, 08-5371PublishedCited by 346 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Chief Judge:
Over twenty years ago, appellant William Moore was indicted and charged with participation in an illegal conspiracy. At the close of the government’s evidence, the trial court dismissed all charges. After his acquittal, appellant filed this action asserting retaliatory prosecution claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and malicious prosecution claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq. (FTCA), against…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by346 opinions
- Winston v. CloughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Peavey v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Glass v. LaHoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Mason v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
341 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.