Belluomini v. Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Robert Belluomini asserts that Fred Meyer breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing when it terminated his employment after receiving multiple complaints about harassment, including sexual harassment, from his coworkers. He also argues that in barring him from the store Fred Meyer violated his constitutional rights, for which he deserves damages, including punitive damages. And Belluomini cites reversible error in the trial court’s handling of the case and disputes the award of attorney’s fees and costs. We find no merit in these claims, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mitchell v. Teck Cominco Alaska Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Jackson v. American Equity Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Kellis v. CritesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Charles v. Interior Regional Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Adkins v. StanselAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.