Legal Opinion

Kellis v. Crites

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2001No. S-9276PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury returned a verdict for a personal injury defendant who had made a $250 pretrial offer of judgment. This appeal concerns the post-trial awards of litigation costs and attorney's fees. Because the parties agree that it was error to award the defendant 100% of her attorney's fees under Civil Rule 68 and AS 09.30.065(a)(1), we vacate the fees award and remand. We also vacate the cost award and remand for submission of a cost bill to the clerk of court.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

KyndelFaye Mercedes Kellis sued Virginia M. Crites in January 1998 for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Jaso v. McCarthyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gunderson v. University of Alaska, FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Belluomini v. Fred Meyer of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bobich v. HughesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Shehata v. Salvation ArmyAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Cook Schuhmann & Groseclose, Inc. v. Brown & Root, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Rhodes v. ErionAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API