Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Stansel

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2009No. S-13114PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An Alaska prisoner in a private Arizona prison facility sued a prison official for allegedly violating his constitutional rights by denying visitation with a relative who had traveled from Alaska. The superior court dismissed the suit for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief might be granted, stating that "an isolated incident which prevented visitation due to an acknowledged oversight by prison officials is not a Constitutional violation under Alaska law." - Because the prisoner's complaint must be read to allege an intentional rather…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Overton v. BazzettaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Peoples v. CCA Detention CentersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Kollodge v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Larson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State, Department of Corrections v. HeiseyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Pedersen v. BlytheAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Cornelison v. TIG InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API