Legal Opinion

Brotton v. Donovan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1929No. Nos. 27,214, 27,431PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Action to partition certain lands in Freeborn county. Plaintiff alleged that he and defendant were tenants in common. Defendant-denied that plaintiff owned any interest-whatever in the land. When the trial had developed that the husband of defendant, Richard Donovan, residing in Freeborn county, on January 26, 1924, died seized in fee of the lands in question and that thereafter his estate was duly probated and a final.decree entered by the probate court of said county December 8, 1924, decreeing' defendant the sole heir and assigning to and vesting in her all of said lands of Richard…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Christianson v. King CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Culver v. HardenberghSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Greenwood v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  4. Fitzpatrick v. Simonson Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Savela v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Surety Corporation of New York v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  2. Bengtson v. SetterbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Vesey v. VeseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Murray v. CalkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. In Re Estate of HenckeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API